home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
102593
/
10259925.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-05-25
|
4KB
|
83 lines
<text id=93TT0116>
<title>
Oct. 25, 1993: Reviews:Cinema
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
Oct. 25, 1993 All The Rage:Angry Young Rockers
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
REVIEWS, Page 80
Cinema
"Who Will Go With Me!"
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By RICHARD SCHICKEL
</p>
<list> TITLE: Gettysburg
WRITER-DIRECTOR: Ronald F. Maxwell
</list>
<p> THE BOTTOM LINE: That cinematic rarity, an intelligent epic,
reanimates one of history's crucial, tragic moments.
</p>
<p> There are three compelling reasons to see Gettysburg. The first
is General Robert E. Lee, the second is Colonel Joshua Lawrence
Chamberlain, and the last is Brigadier General Lewis Armistead.
They don't embrace all the contortions imposed on the human
spirit by the military necessity, but they'll do for a potent,
dramatic start. And their existence as well-drawn figures amid
the hubbub of a four-hour epic speaks well for writer-director
Ronald Maxwell's sober intentions and very creditable achievements
in this film.
</p>
<p> Of the three, Martin Sheen's Lee is the most startling. In our
folklore (and in the hearts of his troops) the Confederate leader
has been granted near saintly status. Sheen gives us the dark
side of the holy warrior, a man of courtly manners who is possessed
by a vision of a vainglorious, straight-ahead assault on the
enemy's center--the vision that produced Pickett's disastrous
charge. It was a course of action that defied reason (personified
here by Lieutenant General James Longstreet, who is underwritten
and underplayed by Tom Berenger).
</p>
<p> Lee's opposite number in the film's dramatic scheme is Colonel
Chamberlain, commander of a ravaged regiment assigned to defend
the Union flank on the hill known as Little Round Top. A college
professor and, as played by Jeff Daniels, a soft-spoken humanist-idealist,
he is democratic man at his best. And a commander of steely
resolve. Almost out of ammunition, unable to withstand another
Confederate charge, he mounts a bayonet assault of his own,
downhill and through heavy woods (in the film's best combat
sequence).
</p>
<p> Finally, there is the late Richard Jordan's Armistead, the film's
great romantic, haunted by the fact that he must meet his best
friend in battle--haunted too by his unrequited love for the
man's wife. "Virginians! Who will go with me!" he cries, rushing
to his gallant doom.
</p>
<p> All these performances are touched with a sense of rue, a sense
of lives caught up in forces they cannot master. This, together
with our knowledge of the dreadful cost of the battle, lends
a terrible poignancy to the film. The fact that Maxwell struggled
for a decade to realize the project (even mortgaging his home
to retain the rights to Michael Shaara's Pulitzer-prizewinning
novel, The Killer Angels, on which he based his screenplay)
lends a certain critical tolerance to one's view of the film,
which lingers too long over the preparations for engagement,
contains perhaps too many couriers galloping up with exposition
and concludes with a battle that is handled rather distantly
and bloodlessly. These flaws, though, are minor compared with
the acuity of the film's best characterizations, the vaulting
scale of its design and, above all, its old-fashioned belief
that history, besides being instructive in itself, can--and
should--be a great movie subject.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>